Table Logo

TABLE is a global platform for knowledge synthesis, for reflective, critical thinking and for inclusive dialogue on debates about the future of food.

TABLE seeks to facilitate informed discussions about how the food system can become sustainable, resilient, just, and ultimately “good”. We impartially set out the evidence, assumptions, and values that people bring to food system debates. 

Growing public awareness of interconnected crises including climate change, biodiversity loss, malnutrition and inequality means that the environmental and social impacts of the food system are being scrutinised more closely. Furthermore, debates about the future of food are becoming more intense, divisive and polarised.

TABLE’s starting premise is that while debate is essential, polarisation is damaging. Our mission is therefore to support dialogue on food systems that is more nuanced and self-reflective. 

Better dialogue requires two ingredients. First, scientific knowledge helps us to understand the issues and complexities around healthy and sustainable food. However, science alone cannot tell us how to act or decide what a good and ethical food system is. The second crucial ingredient is understanding how debates are influenced by people’s values and preferences. This is where TABLE steps in.

People hold many - sometimes contradictory - values, desires, assumptions and cultural preferences. These influence how they interpret scientific evidence, understand today’s world, judge what is most important in a food system, and think about possible and desirable futures. For example, a person’s opinion of whether we need to eat less meat may depend, among other things, on what they believe about the malleability of human nature, what landscapes should look like, and the moral standing of animals.

These underlying values need to be brought into the open and more explicitly discussed. When they are not, the consequences are all too often miscommunication, the entrenchment of existing positions, and inertia.

TABLE's goal therefore is to engage with a wide range of stakeholders and perspectives to reflect on values, to clarify the arguments, assumptions and evidence around issues of concern, and - where possible - to identify points of commonality.

 

How TABLE works

Our mission is to act as an honest broker in global food systems debates, while acknowledging that the current food system is in need of major transitions. We aim to bridge unhelpful divides by providing a platform and a method for deliberative dialogue, together with impartial analysis of key contestations.

TABLE sets out the evidence, assumptions, and values underpinning different viewpoints on food systems controversies. Through mapping debates, we highlight critical differences and areas of agreement, identify research questions to help resolve uncertainties, and suggest paths forward.

A key part of TABLE's process is facilitating dialogue between diverse voices in the food system. We aim to engage a wide variety of stakeholders, including researchers, farmers, industry, civil society and policymakers, and bring together representatives of different regions, sectors, areas of expertise and viewpoints. We seek to engage in debates impartially, while recognising that everyone, including our own staff members, has their own assumptions and values. Read more here: What do we mean by the word ‘impartiality’?

We use several methods of dialogue to tease apart contentious issues, including:

  • Spoken or written interviews 
  • Invited blog posts
  • Exchange of letters between stakeholders
  • Panel discussions and workshops
  • Our online discussion forum

As well as providing a platform for a wide range of voices, we describe and explore the conversation, leading to the following open-access outputs:

  • Building Blocks: Short, peer-reviewed, foundational explainers of key concepts relevant to food systems and sustainability and their associated debates. Their function is to foster greater basic food systems literacy within the stakeholder community and ensure that debates do not simply arise from misunderstandings or differing definitions.
  • Debates Dissected reports: Analytical, peer-reviewed reports, drawing upon our dialogue process and describing the debate. The goal is to help stakeholders reach a better mutual understanding of the reasons for agreements and disagreements, while highlighting areas that hold promise for more collaborative thinking and agreement.
  • Podcasts: Each series focuses on a particular themes, each involving a range of speakers and perspectives on a particular question within the theme.

TABLE plans to apply this methodology to a wide variety of themes. Our first project focuses on the question of scale in the food system.

TABLE’s work is an ongoing and iterative process. We welcome feedback on our methodology.

 

TABLE's structure

We are a collaboration between the University of Oxford, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) and Wageningen University and Research (WUR). TABLE is the successor to the Food Climate Research Network, based at the University of Oxford, which for 15 years conducted, synthesised, and communicated research on food sustainability. You can find previous FCRN explainers and FCRN reports on our website.

While TABLE is rooted in academia, we are not purely academic in our outputs - rather, we aim to retain the impartiality of academic research while connecting information to a wider audience in an accessible manner as well as fostering dialogue among diverse stakeholders.

Related Organisations

Connected Content

A combination of sustainability, health & animal welfare concerns are pushing a shift away from meat in our diets to alternative proteins.

This topic refers to the whole food supply chain, from farm fork, and all the products and services that contribute to food production.

Lots of initiatives are measuring and reporting the carbon or greenhouse footprint of products or activities, including crops, livestock and food.

Where does rewilding sit in the future of food and agriculture? Rewilding is a contested term, described by some as laying a foundation for global biodiversity restoration and by others as a threat to human and non-human life in the countryside. This explainer explores how and why people disagree about rewilding, compares its various definitions, and considers how the rewilding debate ties in with different visions for the future of food.

This piece is a brief summary of the TABLE Explainer Rewilding and its implications for agriculture and aims to illuminate key debates surrounding rewilding.

Please share resources, information and experiences, relating to food itself. 

This Topic doesn't yet have a Stewarded summary, but connected groups, content and organisations show below. Click the 'Ask to Join' button if you would like to be a Steward for this Topic and provide a summary of current knowledge and recommend useful resources, organisations, networks and projects. "Like" this Topic if you would like to see it prioritised for providing a wikipedia style summary.

This Topic doesn't yet have a Stewarded summary, but connected groups, content and organisations show below. Click the 'Ask to Join' button if you would like to be a Steward for this Topic and provide a summary of current knowledge and recommend useful resources, organisations, networks and projects. "Like" this Topic if you would like to see it prioritised for providing a wikipedia style summary.   Branston are creating a potato derived protein product.

How we manage our farms and fields is not only important for the nutrition of crops and livestock, but also for the quality and nutritive value of the food we eat.

The history of protein, from its 'discovery' and naming in 1838, is a story weaving science, nutritional politics, cultural attitudes to food, and much more. An understanding of this history is invaluable if we are to contextualise the current focus on protein that characterises discourses about health and sustainable food systems, and popular beliefs about fitness and nutrition. In this piece, Tamsin Blaxter and Tara Garnett from Table trace the history of protein from 1838 through to the end of the 'Protein fiasco' in 1974, discovering many echoes of the modern day.

Where does rewilding sit in the future of food and agriculture? Rewilding is a contested term, de